Review



stepper motor control system allegra-1–10  (Optimal Engineering Systems Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Optimal Engineering Systems Inc stepper motor control system allegra-1–10
    (a) The experimental setup included a pulley <t>system</t> that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear <t>stepper</t> <t>motor</t> housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.
    Stepper Motor Control System Allegra 1–10, supplied by Optimal Engineering Systems Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stepper+motor+control+system+allegra-1%E2%80%9310/pmc03037775-61-34-39?v=Optimal+Engineering+Systems+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stepper motor control system allegra-1–10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Spatial perception and adaptive sonar behavior"

    Article Title: Spatial perception and adaptive sonar behavior

    Journal: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    doi: 10.1121/1.3504707

    (a) The experimental setup included a pulley system that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear stepper motor housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (a) The experimental setup included a pulley system that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear stepper motor housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    stepper motor control system allegra-1–10  (Optimal Engineering Systems Inc)
    90
    Optimal Engineering Systems Inc stepper motor control system allegra-1–10
    (a) The experimental setup included a pulley <t>system</t> that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear <t>stepper</t> <t>motor</t> housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.
    Stepper Motor Control System Allegra 1–10, supplied by Optimal Engineering Systems Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/stepper+motor+control+system+allegra-1%E2%80%9310/pmc03037775-61-34-39?v=Optimal+Engineering+Systems+Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    stepper motor control system allegra-1–10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (a) The experimental setup included a pulley system that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear stepper motor housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.

    Journal: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

    Article Title: Spatial perception and adaptive sonar behavior

    doi: 10.1121/1.3504707

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) The experimental setup included a pulley system that carried the target (mealworm), moved by a linear stepper motor housed in a sound-proof box. The distracter object was placed at a given distance from the platform at different angular offsets relative to the target motion axis. Sonar vocalizations were monitored by two microphones on each side of the platform over 2 m distance and by one placed under the platform, (b) Overhead view of the setup showing target motion axis and angular offsets (5°, 10°, 20°, 30°, and 40°) and distances (45 and 70 cm) of the distracter. (c), (d) Target position (c) and velocity (d) with reference to the platform during a standard (solid lines) and a low velocity trial (dashed lines): The desired target speeds were 0.77 and 1.27 m∕s for low velocity and standard target approach trials, respectively.

    Article Snippet: The distance between the platform and the closest end of the rail was 4 m. The speed, acceleration, and direction of the forcer moving along the rail were controlled by a computer via a stepper motor control system (Allegra-1–10, Optimal Engineering Systems Inc.).

    Techniques: